The virtues of lesser evilism debunked in 11 seconds.

The question was that 'if you could launch a cruise missile that would take out bin Laden, that would kill him, but it would also kill innocent civilians as well, would you give the order to launch the missile?'

Of course the next question to Hillary would be, "What if  your daughter Chelsea was one of the innocents to be killed, would you still step right up there and launch the missile?" Or better yet, "would you be willing to step in there and exchange places with one of your collateral damages?"

And of course one would also wonder what is her threshold number for tolerable innocents killed are worth her, what number of innocent deaths would she consider a "tremendous amount," the amount that would cause her to not launch the missile.

She's very good, she very quickly reframes the question to be about collateral damage instead of killing innocent people.