10 minutes of truth leaked out during the Democratic debate, 5/2007.

Here's a link to the other 10 minutes of truth that leaked out the month before->>

Gravel: "The insurgency is successful because the population sustains that insurgency."

Question: Would you kill innocent civilians in order to "take out"  bin Laden?

Answer Kucinich: 'A president who believes in peace wouldn't use assassination as a tool....bin Laden should be held to account in an International Court of Law, and so should ANY OTHER person who's involved in a violation of International Law...'

Comment: "It depends how many innocent civilians..."

Answer Hillary: "Yes, if we could do it without a TREMENDOUS

AMOUNT of collateral damage...."

Obama: 'When you have a military target like bin Laden, you take him out swiftly, and surely.'

My comment on the above: Would Hillary, Obama, and the other's be willing to step in and die in place of some of the innocent civilians they're assigning to be killed? IMHO, a person doesn't have the right to assign an  innocent person to death because they're not the one who's doing the dying.

Kucinich: "We need to get out of NAFTA and the WTO and go back to bilateral trade conditioned on human rights..."

Gravel: "Follow the money. You cant get all this money coming at you, millions of dollars, from special interests and think that they're now going to deal with solving the problem of special interests."

Kucinich: '[You hear] Hillary say that this is George Bush's war, oh NO. There's a teachable moment here. This war belongs to the Democratic Party because they were put in charge by the people in the last election with the thought that they would end the war. WELL THEY HAVEN'T. They have to stop the funding.'